|

|
 |
LUKA DONCIC
HØJBJERG TIGERS
PLAYER HISTORY |
 |
 |
Drafted 3rd overall in the 2018 MBA Draft by Højbjerg Tigers |
SEASON | TEAM | GP | GS | MIN | UNM.FP | PTS | RBS | AST | STL | TRN | BLK | FG% | FT% |
 |
 |
2018/2019 |
Højbjerg Tigers |
16 |
8 |
30.9 |
19.56 |
19.6 |
6.1 |
5.8 |
1.3 |
2.9 |
0.4 |
.429 |
.678 |
2019/2020 |
Højbjerg Tigers |
17 |
17 |
33.4 |
34.71 |
31.4 |
9.9 |
9.4 |
1.1 |
4.1 |
0.2 |
.486 |
.769 |
2020/2021 |
Højbjerg Tigers |
18 |
18 |
36.2 |
31.78 |
29.7 |
8.2 |
9.3 |
1.2 |
4.1 |
0.8 |
.488 |
.705 |
 |
 |
 |
3 seasons |
Højbjerg Tigers |
51 |
43 |
33.6 |
28.92 |
27.1 |
8.1 |
8.2 |
1.2 |
3.7 |
0.5 |
.473 |
.728 |
 |
 |
GAME BY GAME STATS |
 |
 |
Last 20 fantasy games played: |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
2020/21 |
HT |
week 20, vs MO |
G |
27 |
6 |
- |
16 |
2 |
- |
9 |
1 |
- |
2 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
15 |
10.0 |
10 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 19, vs OO |
G |
39 |
15 |
- |
27 |
4 |
- |
13 |
4 |
- |
5 |
0 |
9 |
9 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
38 |
40.0 |
40 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 18, vs MO |
G |
43 |
16 |
- |
28 |
6 |
- |
11 |
4 |
- |
5 |
1 |
6 |
9 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
42 |
45.0 |
45 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 17, vs RR |
G |
38 |
9 |
- |
23 |
4 |
- |
11 |
3 |
- |
4 |
0 |
10 |
16 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
5 |
25 |
31.0 |
31 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 16, vs JBH |
G |
39 |
9 |
- |
20 |
2 |
- |
10 |
2 |
- |
3 |
1 |
12 |
12 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
4 |
22 |
28.0 |
28 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 14, vs NK |
G |
34 |
11 |
- |
21 |
3 |
- |
10 |
2 |
- |
6 |
0 |
6 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
27 |
27.0 |
27 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 13, vs SB |
G |
38 |
11 |
- |
23 |
6 |
- |
8 |
3 |
- |
4 |
2 |
10 |
8 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
34.0 |
34 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 12, vs OO |
G |
33 |
8 |
- |
18 |
3 |
- |
10 |
2 |
- |
9 |
0 |
7 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
21 |
15.0 |
15 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 10, vs MO |
G |
40 |
17 |
- |
30 |
5 |
- |
8 |
7 |
- |
9 |
1 |
8 |
12 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
46 |
50.0 |
50 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 9, vs RR |
G |
37 |
9 |
- |
18 |
2 |
- |
7 |
8 |
- |
10 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
28 |
35.0 |
35 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 8, vs NK |
G |
38 |
12 |
- |
23 |
7 |
- |
12 |
11 |
- |
14 |
1 |
7 |
11 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
42 |
40.0 |
40 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 7, vs HD |
G |
38 |
7 |
- |
19 |
1 |
- |
4 |
10 |
- |
11 |
0 |
5 |
8 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
25 |
24.0 |
24 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 6, vs JBH |
G |
32 |
8 |
- |
17 |
2 |
- |
6 |
7 |
- |
10 |
0 |
6 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
25 |
25.0 |
25 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 5, vs SB |
G |
34 |
13 |
- |
24 |
2 |
- |
7 |
2 |
- |
2 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
30 |
26.0 |
26 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 4, vs OO |
F |
36 |
13 |
- |
28 |
4 |
- |
12 |
6 |
- |
6 |
0 |
9 |
11 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
5 |
36 |
39.0 |
39 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 3, vs MO |
F |
36 |
12 |
- |
24 |
1 |
- |
7 |
3 |
- |
7 |
0 |
10 |
13 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
28 |
32.0 |
32 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 2, vs RR |
F |
35 |
14 |
- |
25 |
5 |
- |
9 |
1 |
- |
2 |
2 |
13 |
9 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
34 |
46.0 |
46 |
|
2020/21 |
HT |
week 1, vs OO |
F |
35 |
7 |
- |
20 |
3 |
- |
9 |
3 |
- |
3 |
1 |
11 |
10 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
25.0 |
25 |
|
 |  |  |
2019/20 |
HT |
week 20, vs MO |
F |
31 |
10 |
- |
18 |
3 |
- |
7 |
10 |
- |
12 |
1 |
12 |
8 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
33 |
39.0 |
39 |
|
2019/20 |
HT |
week 17, vs RR |
F |
34 |
11 |
- |
25 |
2 |
- |
11 |
3 |
- |
6 |
1 |
6 |
9 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
27 |
24.0 |
24 |
|
 |
NOTE! Game-by-game statistics were not registered in the MBA database until 1997/1998. |
|
|
|
|